In recent days, there have been allegations of an internal fracture within the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) section in Uttar Pradesh.

As Yogi Adityanath, the chief minister, blamed Keshav Prasad Maurya, his deputy, for the party’s electoral defeat in the Hindi heartland state, there were growing rumors of tension between the two.

Citing the minister, Maurya’s office stated in a mysterious post on X on Wednesday, July 17, that “the organization is bigger than the government.”

The Uttar Pradesh BJP is said to have given a report outlining the reasons behind the saffron party’s election defeats in the northern state to the upper echelon of the party amid these rumors of discord.

According to an India Today story, the BJP compiled a 15-page study based on input from 40,000 party activists representing the 80 Lok Sabha seats in Uttar Pradesh.

According to the BJP report, the party’s vote share has decreased by at least 8% in each of the state’s six regions: Western film Uttar Pradesh, bro, Kanpur-Bundelkhand, Awadh, Gorakhpur, and Kashi.

In Uttar Pradesh, the BJP secured just 33 of the 80 Lok Sabha seats, a sharp down from the 62 seats it had secured in 2019.

The Samajwadi Party and the Congress in Uttar Pradesh led the opposition INDIA group, which won 43 seats.

In the West UP and Kashi regions, where it won just eight of the 28 seats, the saffron party did the worst.

Eight of the thirteen seats in bro, six of the thirteen seats in Gorakhpur, seven of the sixteen seats in Awadh, and just four of the ten seats in the Kanpur-Bundelkhand area were won by the BJP.

According to the BJP’s assessment, several castes have stopped supporting the party in elections.

According to the survey, the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), led by Mayawati, had a ten percent decrease in its vote share, which benefited the Congress in the state.

Ten explanations were provided in the Uttar Pradesh BJP report for the party’s poor showing in the state’s Lok Sabha elections.

The party’s failure in the polls is attributed to the “high-handedness” of state administration and authorities.

Dissatisfaction with the UP government among BJP employees was another factor. The party employees had grievances against the state’s senior brass, but they had no way of raising them.

After Uttar Pradesh, which cast votes in all seven stages of the Lok Sabha, the party volunteers were likewise worn out.

The BJP distributed tickets ahead of schedule, which dampened the workers’ enthusiasm for the sixth and seventh voting stages.

The BJP’s chances in the polls were also impacted by its leaders’ comments about “changing” the Constitution if the party surpasses 400 members. Additionally, the party was unable to refute the opposition’s claim that reservations will be eliminated by the saffron party.

This was exacerbated, according to India Today, which cited the BJP allegation, by the state administration’s purported penchant for hiring contract workers from the general category when hiring for government employment.

According to the party’s analysis, the BJP’s chances of winning the UP election were harmed by a number of document leaks in government employment over the previous six years, government officials’ resentment of the outdated pension plan, and worries over the Firepath recruitment program for Army troops.

The names of the BJP’s main supporters absent from the electors’ list in roughly all seats, between 30,000 and 40,000, additionally also cost the party.

In order to discuss the findings, BJP national president JP Nadda, Home Minister Amit Shah, and UP BJP chairman Bhupendra Chaudhary met.

In Delhi, Deputy Chief Minister Maurya also met Nadda. In the days ahead, more gatherings of this kind involving leaders of the state and Central parties are anticipated. According to reports, Yogi Adityanath and Brijesh Pathak would be summoned to Delhi for the same.